Decision No. 17,684
Appeal of S.C., on behalf of her child P.C. and K.C., from action the Board of Education of the Orchard Park Central School District regarding immunization.
Decision No. 17,684
(July 3, 2019)
Law Offices of Carolyn Nugent Gorczynski, attorney for petitioner, Carolyn Nugent Gorczynski, Esq., of counsel
Hodgson Russ LLP, attorneys for respondent, Andrew J. Freedman, Esq., of counsel
ELIA., Commissioner.--Petitioner appeals the determination of the Board of Education of the Orchard Park Central School District (“respondent”) that her child (“the student”) is not entitled to a religious exemption from the immunization requirements of Public Health Law (“PHL”) §2164. The appeal must be dismissed.
In June 2018, before the student entered kindergarten at one of respondent’s schools, petitioner applied for a religious exemption from immunization on her behalf. By letter dated August 24, 2018, respondent denied petitioner’s request. This appeal ensued. Petitioner’s request for interim relief was granted on September 24, 2018.
Petitioner argues that respondent’s process was flawed and that its denial lacked sufficient detail. Petitioner also contends that respondent’s denial was arbitrary and capricious because she demonstrated that her objection to immunizations is based on sincerely-held religious beliefs.
Respondent contends that it properly denied petitioner’s request for a religious exemption inasmuch as the body of evidence before it demonstrated that petitioner’s objections were not primarily based on religion.
At all times relevant to the events leading to this appeal, Public Health Law §2164 included provisions authorizing an exemption based on religious beliefs to required immunizations. Specifically, Public Health Law §2164(9) provided:
[t]his section shall not apply to children whose parent, parents, or guardian hold genuine and sincere religious beliefs which are contrary to the practices herein required, and no certificate [of immunization] shall be required as a prerequisite to such children being admitted or received into school or attending school.
However, on June 13, 2019, Chapter 35 of the Laws of 2019 was enacted, effective immediately, which repealed subdivision nine of §2164 of the Public Health Law, thus eliminating the religious exemption to immunization requirements to attend school.
The appeal, therefore, must be dismissed as moot. The Commissioner will only decide matters in actual controversy and will not render a decision on a state of facts which no longer exist or which subsequent events have laid to rest (Appeal of Sutton, 57 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,331; Appeal of a Student with a Disability, 48 id. 532, Decision No. 15,940; Appeal of M.M., 48 id. 527, Decision No. 15,937).
With the enactment of Chapter 35 of the Laws of 2019, effective June 13, 2019, no student may be exempted from required immunizations based on religious beliefs, such as the exemption claimed by petitioner in this appeal. The legislative intent of Chapter 35 is to protect the public health by ending non-medical exemptions from immunization (see Sponsor’s Mem. Bill Jacket, L 2019, ch 35). As a result, the relief sought by petitioner – an order granting a religious exemption to the immunization requirements of Public Health Law §2164 - may no longer be obtained, rendering this matter academic. Consequently, the appeal must be dismissed as moot.
In light of this disposition, I need not consider the parties’ remaining contentions.
THE APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
END OF FILE
 PHL §2164(7)(a), as also amended by Chapter 35 of the Laws of 2019, provides, “[n]o principal, teacher, owner or person in charge of a school shall permit any child to be admitted to such school, or to attend such school, in excess of fourteen days, without [a certificate of immunization] or some other acceptable evidence of the child’s immunization against poliomyelitis, mumps, measles, diphtheria, rubella, varicella, hepatitis B, pertussis, tetanus, and, where applicable, Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib), meningococcal disease, and pneumococcal disease; provided, however, such fourteen day period may be extended to not more than thirty days for an individual student by the appropriate principal, teacher, owner or other person in charge where such student is transferring from out-of-state or from another country and can show a good faith effort to get the necessary certification or other evidence of immunization or where the parent, guardian, or any other person in parental relationship to such child can demonstrate that a child has received at least the first dose in each immunization series required by this section and has age appropriate appointments scheduled to complete the immunization series according to the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices Recommended Immunization Schedules for Persons Aged 0 through 18 Years.”